10 月 16 日的托福考試已經結束,考生們的表現各不相同。此次考試究竟考了哪些内容?又(yòu)有(yǒu)哪些題目成為(wèi)了考生們的 “攔路虎”?接下來,我們将對 10 月 16 日的托福考試考情進行全面回顧,為(wèi)大家一一解答(dá)這些疑問。
#01 獨立口語思路解析
10月16日托福考試
Some students like to review their notes regularly on a daily basis, while others like to review their notes just before the test. Which do you prefer?
答(dá)法一:daily review
1、保證複習質(zhì)量:舉例面對較難的知識如“曆史課上大量年份日期/經濟”,課上很(hěn)多(duō)概念理(lǐ)論術語,需要提前做好準備,每天鞏固重複記憶,避免遺忘
2、減輕考前壓力:對比考試前往往需要多(duō)門科(kē)目一起複習,心理(lǐ)負擔重,容易考前焦慮,但如果能(néng)每天複習,複習壓力減輕,更加自信穩定發揮
關鍵詞:make sure reviewing quality, repetitively memorize, prepare in advance
Alleviate the pressure, mental burden, stabilize the performance
答(dá)法二:just before the test
1、每天更多(duō)空餘時間:舉例作(zuò)為(wèi)高中(zhōng)生,考前每天有(yǒu)很(hěn)多(duō)任務(wù):申請/文(wén)書/材料;不用(yòng)每天複習可(kě)以讓自己有(yǒu)時間勞逸結合,投入自己的愛好,減輕壓力
2、更适合短期記憶的學(xué)生:舉例自己比較擅長(cháng)瞬時記憶,複習背誦特定曆史年份時,速記記憶更準确;每天複習反而是機械性記憶
關鍵詞:more time available, hectic lifestyle, balance study and life,Instant memory, specific timeline of historical events, rote memory
#02學(xué)術讨論寫作(zuò)思路解析
10月16日托福考試
Dr. Achebe
In recent years, the rise of artificial intelligence has introduced Al generators to draft essays and articles. While some people believe this is a valuable tool that can help writers save time and enhance their creativity, others argue that relying on Al undermines the development of writing skills and critical thinking. Do you think Al generators should be restricted? Please explain your reasoning.
Claire:I think Al generators should be restricted, mainly due to the high risk of plagiarism. Since Al doesn't always cite its sources, writers could unintentionally use ideas from others without proper attribution. For example, relying too much on Al could result in students facing academic penalties if their work is flagged for unoriginal content.
Andrew:I believe Al generators should continue to be used because they help writers focus on polishing their work rather than getting stuck on initial drafts. From my experience, Al can highlight mistakes or improve structure. it allows me to spend more time refining their ideas, ultimately producing higher-quality essays.
題目類型:對立題型
贊同立場:Claire 限制AI寫作(zuò)工(gōng)具(jù)
論述邏輯:借助AI寫作(zuò)-- 寫作(zuò)内容來源于數據庫或者已經存在的文(wén)章--内容不具(jù)備個人的經驗和個人寫作(zuò)風格--缺乏獨特性和個性化表達--不利于培養獨立思維
using AI for writing - the content is sourced from databases or pre-existing articles - lack personal experience and individual writing style - short of uniqueness and personalized expression - not conducive to fostering independent thinking.
電(diàn)話:400-963-5018
地址:上海黃浦區(qū)漢口路266号申大廈11樓
交通:地鐵2、10号線(xiàn)南京東路站3号口
Copyright ©2023上海瀾大教育信息咨詢有(yǒu)限公(gōng)司. All Rights Reserved 京ICP證000000号 滬公(gōng)網安(ān)備31010102007782
Copyright ©2023上海瀾大教育信息咨詢有(yǒu)限公(gōng)司. All Rights Reserved 京ICP證000000号 滬公(gōng)網安(ān)備31010102007782